Networks, Complexity, and Relatedness

Networks, Complexity, and Relatedness
Inquiry and learning into social networks, organizational network analysis, and the relationships among people and systems in complex organizations and networks.

This blog is MOVING: new site is almost ready: change your readers, now: http://www.pattianklam.com/blog

Sunday, September 14, 2003

It's about relationships

I attended a talk by Dr. Daniel Blass at the Harvard Business School on Friday. A purely academic talk, one of those in which I find that things that I have taken for granted as generally true have not yet been proven. Colleagues from the Gennova Group got together to 'debrief' afterward and that was where the learning happened.

Some things we didn't know we knew: you need strong ties for exchanging tacit knowledge, and weak ties suffice for exchanging explicit knowledge (plain old communicating). There are really two ways to think about strong vs weak ties. The original definition had to do with redundancy. If you and I each have a ties with a number of the same people, then our tie is strong because there is redundancy.

The newer definition gets into the actual attributes of the tie, that is, if we have known and trusted each other for a long time and go to each other for advice, then we have a strong tie.

posted by Patti | permalink (click to comment)

Comments: Post a Comment

patti anklam. How to make networks work.

links: networks

My ONA Page

Rob Cross
Bruce Hoppe
Valdis Krebs
INSNA
ONA-prac. The online community for learners and practitioners in the emerging field of Organizational Network Analysis.

links: blogroll

21st Century Organization
Anecdote

Dave Snowden
David Gurteen
Jack Vinson