Networks, Complexity, and Relatedness
Inquiry and learning into social networks, organizational network analysis, and the relationships among people and systems in complex organizations and networks.


Tuesday, January 28, 2003

Following my recent post, I received email from Rene de Vries in Holland, who runs a Dutch community of interest on knowledge management. Rene worked at Digital during the same period that I did, and I remembered his name from many NOTES conferences. Rene said in his email,

The funny part is that I continue to meet people who have a very fond memory on how Notes (and VTX) was used in Digital. In fact, I still think of it as an example for both corporate culture and the supporting tools to make it work. Some of the knowledge logging (K-LOG) initiatives that are now emerging where already much in vogue in those day.

It reminded me of a note that my friend Karl sent me last December about NOTES:

Maybe it's like the memory of the taste of my grandmother's pie, but none of the current collaboration tools beats Notes.

posted by Patti | permalink (click to comment)
(0) comments



Monday, January 27, 2003



Thinking about collaboration today, I was telling my friend Karl over coffee about joining CPsquare. (more on this later or another day). He asked me if I remembered the relationship between Lotus Notes and VAX NOTES. (We are both alumni of Digital Equipment, one of the first networked companies, where communities of interest and communities of practice abounded long before there was a name for them.) My friend Karl came up with some history pages for people who are interested:

I wrote up my personal reflections on the use of NOTES in Digital for KM Magazine. Please send me a note if you'd like a copy.

posted by Patti | permalink (click to comment)
(0) comments



Sunday, January 26, 2003



Well, SOCNET (the listserv for researchers in social networks and complexity), had a number of things to say about this NYT article. Barry Wellman sent the following to the New York Times:


Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 11:02:33 -0500

From: Barry Wellman

To: new york times letters

Cc: duncan watts

Subject: Erroneous facts

Emily Eakin's story Jan 25 story ("Connect, They Say, Only Connect") makes a huge factual mistake by saying that network analysis as a discipline only started when physicists discovered it in the late 1990s. In reality, it's been going strong since the 1960s, with a substantial body of theory, method and substance. There are three journals [Social Networks Connections - both published since the 1970s; and the Journal of Social Structure], an annual international and interdisciplinary conference (happening for about the 30th time next month), and an international society with about 500 members (the International Network for Social Network Analysis, which I founded in 1977). It's great that physicists (and the NY Times) are joining an already flourishing party


Barry

Other community members hastened to mention the development of sociograms in 1930 and research going back to 1908.

posted by Patti | permalink (click to comment)
(0) comments



Saturday, January 25, 2003



Valis Krebs, a role model for anyone looking to use SNA in organizational development, points out an article in the New York Times, "Connect, They Say, Only Connect," an interview with Duncan Watts at Columbia University. He is publishing a new book next month, Six Degrees: The Science of the Connected Age, next month. He says that "Network theory has become a bit of a fad... I spend half my time telling people I think it's relevant to a lot of problems people care about and half my time trying to tone down the hype."

Rob Cross is including a description of a project he worked on at my ex-company in Chapter 3 of his book in progress for Harvard Business School Press.

posted by Patti | permalink (click to comment)
(0) comments



Tuesday, January 21, 2003



Booz Allen's strategy+business newsletter is publishing articles on networks, social network analysis and complexity. Karen Stephenson talks about her work in Karen Stephenson's Quantum Theory of Trust, where she emphasizes the element of trust.

Another recent article is a review by Michael Shrage on the wonderful book, Linked, by Albert-László Barabási, Network Theory's New Math. In the intro to the review, Shrage paraphrases Marshall McLuhan more eloquently than I did, "we shape our networks and then our networks shape us."

posted by Patti | permalink (click to comment)
(0) comments



Monday, January 06, 2003



We are our networks. We are who we know. I am in inquiry and learning about social networks in organizations and how they convey knowledge and augment it in transit. This weblog will enable me to share the learning process about social networks, social network analysis, and the emergence of software tools that represent the networks of people and knowledge.

Work and relationships are about conversation -- how ideas and ourselves emerge in dialogue -- and about the changing patterns of our relationships in and outside of work. So this weblog will also include my personal exploration of my existing and future networks.

Social networks are complex. So this weblog is also about complexity.

posted by Patti | permalink (click to comment)
(0) comments

archives

RSS

Powered by Blogger Pro™